Frank Gaffney making the case that Obama’s weakness on the world stage has led Kim Jong Un to believe he can get away with reckless behavior.
Post Tagged with: "anti-missile defense"
North Korea’s Wakeup Call
Because of the growing missile threat from hostile states and terrorists, the first duty of our government is to make deployment of a multi-layered missile defense system to protect the entire United States our urgent national priority.
The Obama Doctrine: Undermine allies, embolden enemies, diminish our country
Those nine words define the Obama Doctrine with respect to American security policy. All three elements were much in evidence in the President’s benighted decision last week to cancel the “Third Site” for intercontinental-range missile defenses in Eastern Europe. They will be on display as well during this week’s several conclaves with foreign leaders.
Chinese-North Korean Axis Heightening Need for U.S. Missile Defense Shield
“Reagan said it was inherently more moral to prevent an attack than to retaliate for one. After all, we’ve already got swords. Why not have shields too?”
China announces advanced fighter, Russia announces missile defense shield, Obama readies for 2012 campaign
Two recent episodes offer an insight into a world in which the United States deliberately adopts a policy of pursuing international peace despite weakness, rather than practice what Ronald Reagan called “peace through strength.”
Obama Dims the Light on Missile Defense
… the language of the treaty — combined with Obama’s softness on the Russians, the Russians’ toughness toward Obama, Obama’s previous pro-Russia moves at the expense of Poles and Czechs, and Obama’s traditionally tepid support of missile defense — is not reassuring.
Why Obama Surrendered the Missile Shield
Eager to appease Russia, the Obama Administration naïvely surrendered missile defense plans on September 17, 2009.
Stop the START treaty – Sen. Jim DeMint
It’s no secret that the Russians do not want the United States or her allies to be protected by missile defense, and believe that New START forbids further development of missile defense.
Still a Non-Starter
New START is inherently unbalanced — and detrimental to American security.
False START
A push to ratify a flawed and dangerous arms limitation treaty to give the president a foreign policy legacy may only succeed in writing our epitaph, leaving our defenses neutered and our enemies emboldened.