“In many cases, these required cost-benefit analyses appear designed to provide political cover for a more stringent regulatory agenda rather than objectively inform policy decisions,” the congressmen wrote. – Daily Caller
Post Tagged with: "Clean Air Act"
June 9, 2011 07:41
Is the NAT GAS Act an EPA Trojan horse?
“Section 403” [..] could clear the legal path for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to pursue the Obama administration’s entire energy agenda via back-door regulations.
March 17, 2011 07:57
The EPA’s Fantastic Clean Air Fictions
“The EPA relies on health studies that exaggerate harm and economic studies that understate regulatory costs in order to maintain the fiction that its ever-more stringent regulations are providing meaningful public health benefits,”
December 29, 2010 09:00
The Immortal Tyranny Of Climate Change
So much for the latest “hard pivot to jobs,” announced only five days ago by President Obama. These EPA regulations are guaranteed job-killers, dropping a huge new tax on every affected business… which will, ultimately, be every business that uses energy.
March 9, 2010 13:29
In Denial: The meltdown of the climate campaign
An exhaustive analysis of the collapse of the climate hysteria hoax.
