“In her testimony this week, Ms. Kagan acknowledged that it is ‘difficult to take off the advocate’s hat and put on the judge’s hat.’ That difficulty is particularly acute for someone like Ms. Kagan, who has spent so much of her adult life practicing the art of political advocacy rather than practicing law.”
Archive for Category: "Judiciary"
Hyper-Partisan Elena Kagan’s Road to the High Court
Kagan has spent her life crassly manipulating the law for political ends.
Planned Parenthood sued in fraudulent over billing of government
A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit has ruled in favor a former employee whistleblower in a multi-million dollar fraud case against Planned Parenthood affiliates in California. A federal district court in California had dismissed the case, but the Ninth Circuit’s ruling reinstates the lawsuit.
NRA Shoots Down Approval Of Kagan Confirmation
The National Rifle Association is opposing Elena Kagan’s nomination to the Supreme Court and warning senators that it will take their votes into account when considering endorsing their re-election. But they opposed Sotomayor also.
Constitution Is Endangered If Kagan OK’d
Barack Obama revealed his goal for the Supreme Court when he complained on Chicago radio station WBEZ-FM in 2001 that the Earl Warren Court wasn’t “radical” enough because “it didn’t break free from the essential constraints placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution” in order to allow “redistribution of wealth.” Call your senator today! 202-224-3121
A Vote for Kagan Is a Vote to Take Away Your Guns
No Senator can seriously claim that he strongly supports gun ownership and still vote for Kagan’s confirmation.
The Supreme Court, Elena Kagan, and Guns
by Ken Klukowski – Kagan wrote to Justice Marshall that, “I’m not sympathetic” to his belief that the Second Amendment is an individual right. When the McDonald case was argued before the Supreme Court, Solicitor General Kagan refused to file a brief either way to express the opinion of the United States government on this monumentally-important case.
Supreme Court Misses the Mark in Christian Club Case
In a dissent written by Justice Samuel Alito, and joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia and Thomas, Justice Alito concluded that the majority decision “is a serious setback for freedom of expression in this country.”
Will Elena Kagan Use Chief Justice Roberts Words Regarding ‘Precedent’ and ‘Stare Decisis’ to Ignore or Overturn Supreme Court ‘Precedent’
Even as the hearing progress, she could be deceiving the Senate Judiciary committee — and herself for that matter — by secretly knowing that she will use the words of Chief Justice Roberts to do whatever she wants once she has her lifetime appointment. Her only goal right now is to be confirmed.