US Action News

New START is inherently unbalanced — and detrimental to American security.

One of the most interesting battles in Washington, taking place mostly behind-the-scenes, involves The Washington Post, a long-time liberal paper backing Democratic Party policies, and a leading liberal Democratic senator.

Sen. Lindsey Graham on the recidivism of terrorists released from GITMO.

With planned votes today on the nightmare Dream amnesty Act and another push to repeal Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, Harry Reid is pushing his majority hard to complete unpopular leftist agenda items before the House goes Republican in January.

Each year, fewer and fewer of the men who witnessed the December 7, 1941 attack in person and survived, gather in Hawaii to “Remember Pearl Harbor,” a cry that united a nation for one the most difficult wars in its history.

The New START treaty, its protocols and annexes all limit U.S. missile defense options. Don’t just take our word for it. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov says so too, insisting that “linkage to missile defense is clearly spelled out in the accord and is legally binding.”

The Framers’ wisdom is confirmed by Barack Obama’s impatience with senators reluctant to ratify, during Congress’s lame-duck session, the New START treaty pertaining to Russia’s nuclear weapons.

Threatening that the US will lose Russian help in pressuring Iran, Obama and future defense secretary Colin Powell lay it on thick for U.S. Jewish organizations.

This is absolute proof that inclusion of open homosexuals would prove disruptive to military operations involving our front-line warriors.

Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Robert Joseph, and former Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Eric Edelman have all argued that New START actually weakens our defenses.