The Alamo – Hallowed American Ground or UN Captive?

December 12, 2013 06:12
The Alamo – Hallowed American Ground or UN Captive?

This is how despots at the United Nations run things. The Federal Government is allowing them to do it for the sake of more Federal power.


by Tom DeWeese


In 1836, 150 courageous and dedicated men died defending the alamoAlamo. They fought in opposition to the rise of authoritarian big government as Mexico abandoned its Republic. The men of the Alamo were essentially betrayed and sacrificed by their own Texas government because of indecision and bickering by its political leadership.

Such a betrayal is about to happen again as our government is moving forward with plans to place the Alamo, symbol of American freedom, into the hands of the United Nations as a World Heritage Site.

As usual, when government bureaucrats attempt such a move they know will bring criticism and anger, they start their denials in advance. We are always assured that a UN designation to American historic sites mean nothing. “It’s just an honorary designation that could help tourism to the site, and thus help the local economy”. We are constantly assured by government officials. And so it begins. Texas Land Commissioner, Jerry Patterson assures Texans that if the Alamo and several other former Spanish missions in San Antonio are added to UNESCO’s World Heritage list, the Alamo will remain under the control of the state of Texas and the Texas Land Office. Well, Commissioner Patterson, perhaps you don’t have all the facts on your desk.

Many Americans have been disturbed to find that there are 22 areas in this nation that have been designated as United Nations’ World Heritage Sites. As a result of a UN treaty called “The Convention Concerning Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage,” such sites come under the jurisdiction of the United Nations’ Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Such designations have been the source of major debate as to whether the UN has gained control of sovereign American territory.

These 22 US sites include such important American historical sites as Independence Hall (where the Declaration of Independence was signed), Thomas Jefferson’s home “Monticello,” and the entire University of Virginia, along with the Statue of Liberty. Also designated are such vast areas of land Yellow Stone National Park, Yosemite National Park, the Great Smoky Mountains and Everglades National Park (which UNESCO has now labeled as “endangered.”  Fully 68 percent of American national parks, preserves and monuments are included in the current UN designations, including vast areas of park lands and wilderness areas such as the Aleutian Islands in Alaska, Joshua Tree National Monument in California, and the Guadalupe Mountains National Park in Texas, to name about half of the current US sites.

Supporters of the UN Heritage Sites say such designations are nothing more than a great “honor” to the nation. They assure us that there is no threat to American sovereignty and that all designated sites remain firmly under control of the United States government.

If true, then the question must be asked, why is an international treaty with the United Nations necessary? The United States has already designated most of the UN Heritage Sites as United States parks. The land is already being preserved and protected for AMERICAN heritage purposes. These lands are valuable for their historical significance to this nation. REPEAT: WHY DO WE NEED AN INTERNATIONAL TREATY TO DO WHAT THE UNITED STATES HAS ALREADY DONE FOR ITSELF?

But what about the Alamo? In 1905 the Texas State Legislature entrusted the care and maintenance of the Alamo to the Daughters of the Republic of Texas (DRT), which under Texas law preserved the historic site “as a sacred memorial to the heroes who immolated themselves upon that hallowed ground.” The DRT received no funds from state or federal sources and maintained the site purely with voluntary contributions. In 2011, the Alamo website explains, “the Texas Legislature granted authority over the Alamo to the Texas General Land Office,” which “signed an agreement to keep the DRT in charge of the daily operation of the Alamo.” (Emphasis added.)  Is it a coincidence that Texas Land Commissioner Patterson is now pushing for the UN World Heritage Site designation?

Obviously the UN has no great feel for the “hallowed ground” of the Alamo or what it means to the people of Texas, or the citizens of the United States. The UN apparently considers the Alamo to be just part of a grouping of historic buildings in the San Antonio area which it refers to as the “San Antonio Franciscan Missions.” Just another historic curiosity.

Who Owns World Heritage Sites?

So, is a World Heritage Site designation just an honorary program that will help local tourism? It is a direct threat to national sovereignty? Those supporting the programs correctly point out that UN documents specifically state that each nation maintains its own sovereignty.

government-incompetent-unreliable-untrustworthy-300x224It is also true that you will not find any UN documents clearly stating that the world body controls or owns American soil through the World Heritage Site Treaty. And you will not find blue-helmeted UN soldiers standing guard over any of the sites.

However, closer examination reveals that there is a direct threat to national sovereignty, just the same. The problem stems from the program mandates and implementation – and how they link to other treaties and agreements. If those mandates are accepted by Congress, they could lead to direct loss of American sovereignty.

Dr. Michael Coffman, of Environmental Perspectives, Inc, explains, “when an international treaty or agreement is signed, we agree to the terms and conditions of the agreement, and by default we have given up a portion of our national sovereignty in order to meet those terms and conditions. And while the agreements do not specifically state that the United Nations has sovereignty, they do permit ‘partnerships’ and other forms of cooperation between the U.S. and the UN.”

According to Dr. Coffman, “this type of ‘cooperation’ was demonstrated in 1995 when the Department of Interior invited the World Heritage Committee to visit Yellowstone National Park for the expressed purpose of declaring the park a ‘World Heritage Site In Danger.’ Such a designation mandates the U.S. to correct the problem or face withdrawal of the park by the UN as a World Heritage Site, accompanied by much negative publicity and world scorn. And since only the United Nation’s World Heritage Committee can remove the In Danger classification, the United States is forced to abide by the Committee’s recommendations, thereby, indirectly giving up its sovereign right to govern itself.”

According to Professor Jeremy Rabkin, law professor at George Mason University School of Law, and author of the book, “Law without Nations?,”  “(f)undamentally, sovereignty is an answer to the question: ‘who is in charge?’ There must be an answer to that question to answer the parallel question: ‘who is responsible?’ A sovereign government is ‘responsible’ for the territory over which it exercises its sovereignty. That is the traditional principle in international law.

However, Rabkin goes on to explain, “(t)he assumption behind the World Heritage program is that a site of special historic, cultural or scenic importance is better protected by an international consortium of governments than by the particular sovereign state on whose territory it exists. In other words, such sites will be better protected by diffusing responsibility for their protection among many different governments…”

As Dr. Coffman makes clear, to fully understand the threat to American sovereignty posed by the UN designation of World Heritage Sites, one must first link this program to a series of other treaties and policies, and how they impact American sovereignty. Above all, one must understand that many in the Federal Government, such as the Obama Department of Interior, see such programs as another tool to build massive federal land-control programs.

There is strong evidence of close collaboration between the U.S. Park Service and the UNESCO World Heritage Site Committee. There is also strong evidence that the designation of UN World Heritage Sites goes hand in hand with the Administration’s Sustainable Development program. That program is nothing less than a massive federal zoning program that dictates property development on the local level, in the name of protecting the environment. The goal of Sustainable Development is to lock up vast areas of American land, and shield it from private use.

The designation of United Nations’ World Heritage Sites and Biosphere Reserves can and does result in the centralization of policy-making authority at the federal level, particularly by the Executive Branch. Once a UN designation is made and accepted by the Federal Government there is literally no opportunity for private American land owners to dispute it or undo the designation.

Private property rights literally disappear, not only in the officially designated area, but worse, in buffer zones OUTSIDE the designated area. Not only has the federal government been using these treaties and agreements to limit access to, and use of, these lands to all Americans, but they also have used the UN designations to limit use of private property OUTSIDE the boundaries of the site.

That is exactly what happened outside of Yellowstone National Park (a World Heritage Site) when UNESCO delegates were called in by the Park Service in an attempt to stop the development of a gold mine – located OUTSIDE the park. The UNESCO delegates declared Yellowstone to be the first “endangered” World Heritage Site and called for a protective buffer zone of 150 MILES IN DIAMETER AROUND THE ENTIRE PARK. Such a buffer zone would stop development and access to millions of acres of private property. Such is the true purpose of the World Heritage Sites.

Moreover, in becoming party to these international land-use designations through Executive Branch action, the United States is indirectly agreeing to terms of international treaties, such as the Biodiversity Treaty – a UN treaty that has never been ratified by the United States Senate.

Nevertheless, in 1994, the U.S. State Department published the “Strategic Plan for the U.S. Biosphere Reserve Program.” Taken straight from the unratified Biodiversity Treaty, the State Department program is to “create a national network of biosphere reserves that represents the biogeographical diversity of the United States and fulfills the internationally established roles and functions of biosphere reserves.”

A chief tactic used by the UN and the Federal Government when designating a biosphere reserve or a World Heritage Site is to rarely involve or consult with the public and local governments. In fact, UNESCO policy actually discourages an open nomination for World Heritage Sites. The “Operational Guidelines for the Implementations of the World Heritage Convention” state:

In all cases, as to maintain the objectivity of the evaluation process and to avoid possible embarrassment to those concerned, State (national) parties should refrain from giving undue publicity to the fact that a property has been nominated inscription pending the final decision of the Committee of the nomination in question. Participation of the local people in the nomination process is essential to make them feel a shared responsibility with the State party in the maintenance of the site, but should not prejudice future decision-making by the committee.

In other words, the nominating committee is to hide the fact that a massive land grab is about to take place. Then, at the appropriate moment, the committee is to involve some local yokels to make them think they have something to say about the grab, then send them away, so that the committee can move ahead, unhindered. They aren’t to worry about the fact that private landowners have just lost control of their property.

This is not the way the U.S. Constitution says things should be done. which_will_it_beThis is how despots at the United Nations run things. The Federal Government is allowing them to do it for the sake of more Federal power.

By allowing these international land use designations, the United States promises to protect the sites and REGULATE surrounding lands if necessary to protect the UN-designated area. Honoring these agreements forces the Federal Government to PROHIBIT or limit some uses of private lands outside the international designated area UNLESS OUR COUNTRY WANTS TO BREAK A PLEDGE TO OTHER NATIONS.

In a nutshell, here is the real game being played. Through such policies, the Federal Government is binding our nation to international treaties and agreements that stipulate that the United States will manage these lands in a prescribed manner in order to achieve certain international goals and objectives. In other words, we have agreed to limit our right of sovereignty over these lands.

These are the reasons why it’s clear that World Heritage Sites are an infringement of United States sovereignty. You won’t find the smoking gun by reading the treaties. It can only be found in understanding the “intent” and the “implementation” of the policies.

Texas, one of the great freedom loving states in the Union, would do well to reconsider its naïve and misplaced efforts to sentence the Alamo to the UN’s web of control. The state may just find that it is once again out-gunned at the Alamo – this time by the UN.

Tom DeWeese is one of the nation’s leading advocates of individual liberty, free enterprise, private property rights, personal privacy, back-to-basics education and American sovereignty and independence. Go to for more information
Tom DeWeese’s new book is now on Amazon! Click here for more inforamtion

Also please consider:

Krauthammer: UN is “inherently corrupt” – “sandbox of dictators”

You’re Not in Kansas Anymore Emmeline – Dystopian America Post Agenda 21

The Smoking Gun – direct link between Agenda 21 and local planners!

85% of Americans clueless on Agenda 21

New York’s “Sustainability” Plan: aka “Agenda 21”

9/12 – the Manhattan attack that gave us Obama

Sustainability Marxism

Green Nazis

Obama warned us he would make electricity rates ’skyrocket’

Frightening Quotes from Environmentalists

MORE Frightening Quotes from Environmentalists

Sustainable Nonsense

Consumers pay 38% extra for ‘renewable’ energy mandates

U.N. Continues Push for Global Hegemony with Climate Hoax

What Is Sustainability?

UN IPCC Report Shows Man-made Global Warming is a Hoax

Real sustainability versus activist sustainability

Obama’s Clean-Energy Dirt – Stealing You Blind for a Good Cause?

Let Them Eat Environmentalism – Starve the People, Save the Planet

Governmental Global Warming Lies Heating Up

The New Robber Barons and Their Thief in Chief

Government of, by and for the activists

EPA Funds Green Groups That Sue The Agency To Expand

The Speed of Progressivism

UN Agenda 21 – Coming to a Neighborhood near You

Agenda 21-The U.N. Plan for Your “Sustainable” Community

Continuing Collapse of Global Warming Hoax

U.N.’s Arms Treaty Is Useless

Civilization is Being Killed by Lying “science” Elitists

Kerry Commits U.S. To U.N. Gun Grab Treaty

Who Runs The World? Solid Proof That A Core Group Of Wealthy Elitists Is Pulling The Strings

All Americans to Pay More Global “Fair Share”

As the World Turns … Left – What the Future Holds

UN Pushes Nightmare for America with Global Redistribution Scheme

Senate Considers Dangerous United Nations Treaty Undermining Parental Rights

Private Property Ownership is the Only Way to Eradicate Poverty

National Heritage Sites and Agenda 21 – Stealing Your Property Rights

“Alger Hiss Day” a Reminder of U.N.’s Anti-Americanism

Time to dump the U.N.

Defund United Nations Failures Now

U.N. Agenda 21: Environmental Piracy

5 Ways Obama Failed at the UN

Global Governance, Agenda 21 and Environmental Piracy

Agenda 21: How Is It Affecting You?

85% of Americans clueless on Agenda 21

Dodging U.N. Bullet

Kerry’s L.O.S.T. Defeat a Win for America

IPCC Admits Its Past Climate Reports Were Junk

Hillary’s End Run Gun Control

Senate Considers Dangerous United Nations Treaty Undermining Parental Rights

UN clings to climate hoax to push global tax and control

Krauthammer: UN is “inherently corrupt” – “sandbox of dictators”

Obama Teams With U.N. for U.S. Gun Control

Selling out America: Destroying U.S. sovereignty via Agenda 21, Part 3

Is Obama forcing military leaders to support L.O.S.T.?

Sustainable Development: The latest UN scare

New scare tactics: Sustainable development and biodiversity “easier sell” than climate change

“Sustainable justice” = redistribution of scarcity

Selling out America: Destroying U.S. sovereignty via Agenda 21, Part 1

UN uses warming myth to justify tax on American families

Globalists hope to impose unprecedented energy, environmental and economic restrictions

More UNsanity – Zimbabwe president, accused of ethnic cleansing and bankrupting his country, asked to champion tourism

L.O.S.T. in U.N. La La Land – another Dem push for global government

Obama forces radical UN agenda on U.S. military

Defeat Law of the Sea Treaty – Again

The sky is falling, the sky is falling – quick, redistribute the wealth

Convenient Lies and Governance of the Earth

Obama Seeks Sovereignty Surrender Via LOST Treaty – call your senator!

Eco-Communism Celebrated Annually on Earth Day

Obama’s Secret War-making for the U.N.

DICED is UN’s Environmental Constitution for the World

International Climate Change Lawsuits Against US?

“Fakegate” Blows Up in Warmist Faces

Agenders, Right Wing Conspirators and Global Governance

The United Nations Wants To Crash The World Economy In Order To Save The Environment

Nazi Roots of Sustainable Development

U.S. Funds Nearly 50% — $31 Million — of U.N.’s Global Warming Panel

Good News from the UN! – they failed

Is it time to exit the dictator honoring UN?

Bolton: Law of the Sea Treaty goal of the international leftists

Ron Paul in 1998 John Birch Society Documentary on the UN

More UN global nonsense – Gender Comes to Climate Change

Thou shalt not question UN “experts”

UN: US to pay climate reparations for harm to Mother Earth

UN green end run could cost US billions

Perry questions value of funding UN and foreign aid

Obama administration gets one right – defunds UNESCO over anti-Israel action … but

A Global Central Bank? Justice Is Not Served by Government Economic Planning

Hillaryous – Clinton fights UN reformer Ros-Lehtinen

Obama to give Arctic to Russians with UN treaty

UN Agenda 21 Marches on in America with the USDA-EPA Partnership

U.N. Group Calls for Abortion as Human Right for 10-Year-Olds, Decriminalization of Prostitution for Youth

In Midst of Debt Talks Record-Setting Contributions to the U.N.

The Epicenter of Anti-Semitism

Is “sustainable” code word for wealth redistribution and centralized control?

Rigging the System: Unraveling the Scheme to Steer Funding and Power to Abortion Groups Through the United Nations

‘Free’ Countries Once Again a Minority on U.N. Human Rights Council

Obama bypasses congress again, embraces transnational law

Iran, Syria Benefit From U.N. Nuclear Assistance Program, Which the State Dep’t Insists on Funding in Full

A World in Disarray

Defund United Nations Failures Now

“The Plan”—Agenda 21 and the Death Knell of Liberty

U.N. Secretary-General calls for global entitlement programs for ‘social justice’

Self Delusion at State on U.N. Reform

UN head Ban Ki-moon wants world to commit environmental suicide, Bill Gates pushes depopulation

Republican-Controlled Congressional Committee Targets United Nations

Stave off Globalism: Reinvigorate Constitutional Principles

ICLEI Primer: Your Town and Freedom Threatened

Obama and Leftist academics are orchestrating an international power play to move outside of our legal systems

Obama apologizes to Indians, supports UN in giving them new ‘rights’

UN subterfuge…the global warming hoax

U.N. Gets New Oversight

Abdication of the West at COP16 Cancun, Mexico

Sharia and Obama’s Foreign Policy

Canada condemns UN anti-Israel ‘hatefest’

Obama Finally Names Nominee for U.N. Reform Post, But He Has No U.N. or Diplomatic Experience

Global Warming, Global Taxes pushed by Obama administration

‘Puppet Master’ Soros Has ‘Fun’ Subversively & Adversely Affecting Societies; Lays Out His Plan For America

John Bolton says we should get out of the UN Human Rights Council

U.S. and Its ‘Broken’ Immigration System to Be Reviewed by U.N. Human Rights Council

UN poised to be even more anti-American

U.S. Urged to Lift Immunity for Criminal Conduct at the U.N.

Dems urge Hillary to push global redistribution of US income for climate hoax

The Great American Gun Ban: The UN Small Arms Treaty

Agenda 21 for dummies – the tyranny of ’sustainability’

UN Anti-Violence Bill Promotes Abortion and Gender Quotas

Whatever Happened to the United Nations?

UN shows anti-Israel bias in Gaza flotilla report

Bono’s big boner

UN corruption is costing US $5 billion a year

Obama’s U.N. Record

U.N. calls for sustainable development, global governance

Obama Endorses Global Taxes on Eve of U.N. Summit

Protecting Parents’ Rights from Activist Judges

You will lose parental rights under this UN treaty

Republicans Blast ‘Livable Communities’ Bill As Washington-Based Central Planning for Cities and Towns

Obama official led Soros ‘fund’ supporting world government, UN treaties, US disarmament

Has the UN become so corrupt its irrelevant?

U.S. Taxpayers to Subsidize New U.N. Agency Promoting Abortion

2nd amendment rights in danger with UN treaty

The UN’s New Scams

Global gun laws move step closer with US policy change

Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s Response To U.N.

Obama Abandons Israel to UN Feeding Frenzy

It is time to kiss off the U.N.

The lefts continuing push for global ‘governance’

Cap and Trade is a UN power grab orchestrated by Maurice Strong et al

IRD Calls on Churches to Condemn Iran’s Election to United Nations Commission on Women

Another reason the UN has become counterproductive

Obama administration continues push for ‘global’ rules which would require global taxes

Happy, Healthy and Hot- new Girl Scouts sex guide by Planned Parenthood

Clinton State Department to use UN ‘Human Rights’ Council to push leftist causes in US

The dark side of the Girl Scouts

The Great IPCC (UN) Climate Meltdown Continues

UN’s IPCC to Admit Misleading (again) Over Glacial Melt

UN Maneuvers to Create ‘Global Gun Control’ with Obama’s Help

U.S. Ignored U.N. Aid Agency’s Fraud and Mismanagement



Help Make A Difference By Sharing These Articles On Facebook, Twitter And Elsewhere: