IPCC and CRU Rewrite Facts But Can’t Rewrite History

August 31, 2010 04:52

We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period…” It showed the 20th century was not the warmest temperatures ever and triggered the email Professor Deming received from a CRU member saying, “We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period.” It appears Michael Mann’s research with the complicity of others was designed to achieve that goal.

By Dr. Tim Ball at Canada Free Press


‘They launched a campaign to discredit extensive evidence from a multitude of sources of the existence of the MWP. They attacked the credibility and work of Willie Soon and Sallie Baliunas who had pulled together the evidence.

This included deliberate efforts by John Holdren, Obama’s current Science Czar.

They spread the falsehood that the MWP wasn’t global, but a Northern Hemisphere aberration.  Most of this work was carried out by members of the CRU and others using the website RealClimate set up for distraction, deception and personal attacks.  The best collection of evidence for global existence of the MWP is the “Medieval Warm Period Project” on the cover of Sherwood and Craig Idso’s excellent website.’

‘The IPCC preaches that climate change and its rate are new. It creates only negative impacts so that plants and animals will not or cannot adapt. Working Groups II and III identify negative impacts of warming and offer mitigation proposals. They’ve convinced politicians that climate change is occurring but only toward warmer temperatures. Good leadership would at least prepare contingency plans for a cooling trend. A study of history shows how climate changes brought about natural adaptation and political change. It also shows how adaptation to cooler conditions is the bigger challenge.’


Help Make A Difference By Sharing These Articles On Facebook, Twitter And Elsewhere:

Interested In Further Reading? Click Here