IPCC Admits Its Past Climate Reports Were Junk

July 18, 2012 08:39

The Obama administration’s war on coal may be unnecessary. Billions of dollars in subsidies to solar and wind may have been wasted. Trillions of dollars of personal income may have been squandered worldwide in campaigns to “fix” a problem that didn’t really exist.



By Joseph L. Bast at American Thinker


In plain English: the IPCC reports are not peer-reviewed.


The IAC found that “the IPCC has no formal process or criteria for selecting authors” and “the selection criteria seemed arbitrary to many respondents” (p. 18). … In other words: authors are selected from a “club” of scientists and nonscientists who agree with the alarmist perspective favored by politicians.


It means that all of the “endorsements” of the climate consensus made by the world’s national academies of science … were based on false or unreliable data and therefore should be disregarded or revised. … that the EPA’s “endangerment finding” — its claim that carbon dioxide is a pollutant and threat to human health — was wrong and should be overturned.


In 2010, we learned that much of what we thought we knew about global warming was compromised and probably false. On June 27, the culprits confessed and promised to do better. But where do we go to get our money back?


Help Make A Difference By Sharing These Articles On Facebook, Twitter And Elsewhere: