You are here: Home » Abortion »

Media Ignores Gruesome Serial Killer for 2 Years

April 18, 2013 05:35

Fearing the damage it could do to the most sacred dogma of the leftist progressives, the left wing media and the party of (D)eath try to hide one of the most gruesome decade long killing sprees. We wrote about this serial killer of African Americans in Jan 2011 and posted the gruesome photos from the grand jury report. (See: “Gruesome photos included in abortion doctors grand jury report“) We also suggested that Gosnell was just doing what Obama spoke for as a senator. (See: “Abortion doctor charged with murder for doing what Obama defended“) Souvenir baby feet in jars, screaming infants with their jaws ripped off and near term babies born alive and then murdered and the Obamedia ignores it. Abortionist Gosnell killed more live kids than died at Sandy Hook yet where is the horrific outcry from the leftists and Obama who are so concerned about “the children?”

Even Fox News who claims to be the only network covering the “house of horrors” is two years late and refuses to the show the pictures. This is “choice” at its end result. Consider these comments from Mother Theresa about abortion and the resulting violence:

“America needs no words from me to see how your

Baby feet in jars

decision in Roe v. Wade has deformed a great nation. The so-called right to abortion has pitted mothers against their children and women against men. It has sown violence and discord at the heart of the most intimate human relationships. It has aggravated the derogation of the father’s role in an increasingly fatherless society. It has portrayed the greatest of gifts — a child — as a competitor, an intrusion, and an inconvenience. It has nominally accorded mothers unfettered dominion over the independent lives of their physically dependent sons and daughters”
And, in granting this unconscionable power, it has exposed many women to unjust and selfish demands from their husbands or other sexual partners. Human rights are not a privilege conferred by government. They are every human being’s entitlement by virtue of his humanity. The right to life does not depend, and must not be declared to be contingent, on the pleasure of anyone else, not even a parent or a sovereign.” (Mother Theresa — “Notable and Quotable,” Wall Street Journal, 2/25/94, p. A14)

“But I feel that the greatest destroyer of peace today is

severed spinal cord to kill live baby

abortion, because it is a war against the child – a direct killing of the innocent child – murder by the mother herself. And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another? How do we persuade a woman not to have an abortion? As always, we must persuade her with love, and we remind ourselves that love means to be willing to give until it hurts. Jesus gave even his life to love us. So the mother who is thinking of abortion, should be helped to love – that is, to give until it hurts her plans, or her free time, to respect the life of her child. The father of that child, whoever he is, must also give until it hurts. By abortion, the mother does not learn to love, but kills even her own child to solve her problems. And by abortion, the father is told that he does not have to take any responsibility at all for the child he has brought into the world. That father is likely to put other women into the same trouble. So abortion just leads to more abortion. Any country that accepts abortion is not teaching the people to love, but to use any violence to get what they want. That is why the greatest destroyer of love and peace is abortion. ”

February 1997 – National Prayer Breakfast in Washington attended by the President and the First Lady. “What is taking place in America,” she said, “is a war against the child. And if we accept that the mother can kill her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another.”

“Any country that accepts abortion, is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what it wants.”

“It is a poverty to decide that a child must die so that you may live as you wish.”

In an appropriately titled piece, “Working Up to Auschwitz” at American Thinker, Richard F. Miniter noted some of the horrors involved:

“But perhaps an even more telling reason for ignoring the

What about her women’s rights?

Gosnell story is that among the terrible details is revealed the fact that many, many babies being aborted late-term survive the process — not just a tiny few, as pro-abortionists keep insisting. And so these innocent little souls have to be murdered.

In Dr. Gosnell’s clinic, typically by cutting their heads off. In one instance, a child arrived on the table with its eyes and jaw torn off by Gosnell’s forceps. While this helpless, sinless, creature lay writhing on the table, screaming, Dr. Gosnell gestured impatiently at an assistant — do something about that.

How many children were so murdered? I believe that Gosnell’s charged with seven counts, but testimony indicates there may have been a hundred — maybe more, maybe a lot more. And so the liberal press, ever supportive of a woman’s right to “choose,” just can’t have that known.” [emphasis added]

Yet the sycophant press circled the wagons to hide the truth when their holy grail of abortion was tarnished by hideous, loathsome discovery of Mr. Hyde’s butcher shop. The leftist progressive myth of “safe, legal and rare” was in danger of drowning in innocent blood of hundreds of live babies killed as a result of the “choice” movement.

L. Brent Bozell III writing at CNSNews.com noted that even left winger Kirsten Powers recognized the hiding of the story:

They started covering it only because of a national outrage that they would so deliberately withhold this horror story from the public — for political reasons.

Kirsten Powers in USA Today insisted: “This should be front page news. When Rush Limbaugh attacked Sandra Fluke, there was non-stop media hysteria…Yet, accusations of babies having their heads severed — a major human rights story if there ever was one — [don’t] make the cut.”

And since Obama and Planned Parenthood have defended this atrocious practice and even spoken against laws that would give aid to surviving babies, Obama’s shameful statement on the Gosnell trial is laughable. Again from Bozell’s article:

And where are you, Mr. President? Your calloused disregard disgusts me too.

You are so quick to lecture, to criticize, even to condemn anyone in this country and anything about this country that in your view points to an injustice that needs to be addressed.

The facts weren’t in (and still aren’t) on the Trayvon Martin killing, but you decided to use your bully pulpit to fuel the flames of racial division. You jumped right in, chose sides and told America that Trayvon looked like he could have been your son.

But you said more than just that. Let me remind you. “I think that every parent in America should be able to understand why it is absolutely imperative that we investigate every aspect of this, and that everybody pulls together, federal, state and local to figure out exactly how this tragedy happened.”

Where are you now, Mr. President?

We know why the president is ignoring this trial. Obama most certainly believes in infanticide. Although the propaganda media has tried their best to hide Obama’s objections to the Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act, it is a matter of public record what then senator Obama said.