Obama Plots Assault on Non-Union Businesses

April 9, 2010 05:06

If this scheme is put into effect, very possibly through an executive order signed by President Obama, it would shatter decades-old, competitive contract rules that seek the best quality work at the lowest price.

by  Donald Lambro at Human Events

The Obama Administration, in one of its most sweeping socio-economic reforms to date, now plans to use the federal contracting system to reward higher-paying unionized firms that give workers bigger healthcare and pension benefits.

If this scheme is put into effect, very possibly through an executive order signed by President Obama, it would shatter decades-old, competitive contract rules that seek the best quality work at the lowest price.

In the still-little-known initiative taking shape in the White House, senior officials are working on regulations that would use the full power of the government’s vast $500 billion a year contracting business to favor firms ,that offer higher wages and economic benefits, while ruling out firms whose wage, pension and even environmental record may not meet with the administration’s approval.

Randall K. Johnson, senior vice president for labor policies at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, has called the scheme a “warmed-over version” of President Clinton’s government contract rules that President George W. Bush repealed upon taking office.

“We strongly opposed the Clinton blacklist regulations and this appears worse than that,” Johnson said.

Michael Tanner, the veteran social welfare analyst at the libertarian Cato Institute, told Human Events that “this is part of the price you pay when you get into bed with the devil.  If you take federal money, you are going to get all of these strings attached.”

“I think the administration is taking the strings tied to these contract rules further than anyone else has before,” Tanner said.

The unprecedented shake-down plan is aimed at pressuring, though the government says prodding, private contractors to boost the pay of millions of lower to middle-income workers.  Or as the arch-liberal New York Times describes the Obama plan now taking shape:

“Because nearly one in four workers is employed by companies that have contracts with the federal government, administration officials see the plan as a way to shape social policy and lift more families into the middle class.”

In a story last month on the secrecy-shrouded plan, called the High Road Procurement Policy, the Wall Street Journal described the White House’s goals quite differently:  “Business groups and unions are at odds over a union-backed proposal to make it easier for government agencies to bypass low bidders and award contracts to higher bidders that pay more wages and benefits…”

“This is an attempt by the unions to force their policy agenda on a wide swath of the economy by rigging the government procurement process,”

Glenn Spencer, executive director of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Workforce Freedom Initiative, told the Journal.

Two of Obama’s left-wing allies have been the driving force behind the push to use the government contract process as a weapon to push up private sector pay and benefits: John Podesta, former White House chief of staff for President Clinton who headed Obama’s transition team, and Andy Stern, president of the powerful, very liberal Service Employees International Union, who is virtually a fixture in the Obama White House.

Both have pushed the administration to use the contract rules to affect social policy, rewarding higher-paying businesses, mostly unionized firms with the government’s business—to bring “more people into the middle class,” as Stern puts it.

The Human Events article continues with more attacks on non-union business:

But this is only the latest scheme by the Obama Administration to go after businesses of one kind or another. Among the others:

— The administration is using the IRS to audit businesses whom they charge are trying to hide employees as independent contractors to avoid paying Social Security, Medicare and unemployment insurance taxes.

Obama’s 2010 budget assumes he can  squeeze another $7 billion out of such firms over 10 years by denying businesses their right to do hire contractors to cut costs.  But the Chamber’s Johnson told the New York Times that the line between employees and workers who agree to perform work as self-employed contractors is murky.  “The goal of raising money is not a proper rationale for reclassifying who falls on what side of the line,” he said.

Some the first actions Obama took when he became President last year were pro-union executive orders aimed at employers doing business with the government, repealing previous Bush orders.

Obama’s orders included requiring employers to post notices in the workplace informing of their rights to join a union while repealing the “Beck notices” that workers cannot be required to join a union.  Obama’s orders also included requiring contractors servicing federal buildings to hire union workers when a new contractor is given the work.


Help Make A Difference By Sharing These Articles On Facebook, Twitter And Elsewhere:

Interested In Further Reading? Click Here