The Hill clings to warming myth – chastises Huntsman’s revision

December 7, 2011 09:09

The Hill reported on Huntsman’s revised position on man-made global warming as a prop to push the false claims by warmers.

By Michael Whipple, Editor

The Hill reported on Huntsman’s revised position on man-made global warming as a prop to push the false claims by warmers.

Without any mention of the thousands of scientists who disagree about warming or climategate and climategate 2.0 which have thousands of emails that show the warming “scientists” manipulated data, hid facts and selectively chose input into their reports and articles to push the warming agenda Daniel Strauss and Ben Geman did their best to push the party line on global warming.

They wrote:

“The dominant view among scientists, however, is that the planet is warming and human activities — notably the burning of coal and oil — are a major reason why.

The National Research Council in a report this year noted that climate change is “very likely caused primarily” by human-induced greenhouse gas emissions.

In 2009, 18 scientific groups — including the American Meteorological Society and the American Association for the Advancement of Science — issued a joint statement on the matter. They said that greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the “primary driver” of climate change.”

Talk about selective reporting! They failed to mention The Hijacking of the American Meteorological Society as written about by Bill Gray Professor Emeritus, Colorado State University. Professor Gray notes the absurdity of using the American Meteorological Society as a source:

The society has officially taken a position many of us AMS members do not agree with. We believe that humans are having little or no significant influence on the global climate and that the many Global Circulation Climate Model (GCMs) results and the four IPCC reports do not realistically give accurate future projections. To take this position which so many of its members do not necessarily agree with shows that the AMS is following more of a political than a scientific agenda.

But this strong positive image is now becoming tarnished as a result of the AMS leadership’s capitulating to the lobby of the climate modelers and to the outside environmental and political pressure groups who wish to use the current AMS position on AGW to help justify the promotion of their own special interests. The effectiveness of the AMS as an objective scientific organization is being greatly compromised.

James Hansen’s predictions of global warming made before the Senate in 1988 are turning out to be very much less than he had projected. He cannot explain why there has been no significant global warming over the last 10-12 years.

Many of us AMS members believe that the modest global warming we have observed is of natural origin and due to multi-decadal and multi-century changes in the globe’s deep ocean circulation resulting from salinity variations.

The same can be said of many of the “scientific groups” noted by Strauss and Geman. Even a UN climate official admits the climate hoax is about redistributing wealth globally. A Professor of the ‘Economics of Climate Change’, Ottmar Edenhofer, Co-Chair of Working Group III of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) whose climate report is the political cover for almost all government action on global warming said:

“Climate policy has almost nothing to do anymore with environmental protection”, says the German economist and IPCC official Ottmar Edenhofer. “The next world climate summit in Cancun is actually an economy summit during which the distribution of the world’s resources will be negotiated.”

If they will lie to you about global warming to enrich themselves or promote a political agenda, what else will they lie about? “truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State” – Joseph Goebbels, Nazi minister of Propaganda.

Nothing so exposes the tyranny of leftists better than their continued dogmatic and religious fervor for the global warming hoax. When a presidential candidate uses a little reason and common sense in examining the real facts on warming the high priests of Gaia like Strauss and Geman seek to brand him a heretic. What was Huntsman’s sin? He simply said:

“There’s not enough information right now to formulate policies in terms of addressing it overall, primarily because it’s a global issue,” Huntsman said. “We can enact policies here, but I wouldn’t want to unilaterally disarm as a country. I wouldn’t want to hinder job creators at a time when our economy is flat.”

Huntsman remained somewhat cowed according to The Hill as he “attempted to walk back his change of position, stressing that nothing he said meant he was denying scientific evidence.’I’m not changing that at all, I still say that,’ Huntsman said when asked on Tuesday if his statement conflicted with his famous tweet.”

The folks at The Hill should do a little research of their own. I’ve listed several articles and videos below to make it easy for them. Or maybe they just want to keep repeating the big lie as a tribute to Joseph Goebbels.

As far as Huntsman goes, his belief in the warming hoax disqualifies him for president or even from any political office. He is truly a RINO.


Follow Michael Whipple on Twitter

Follow usACTIONnews on Twitter or on Facebook

Help Make A Difference By Sharing These Articles On Facebook, Twitter And Elsewhere:

Interested In Further Reading? Click Here