Obama Tired of Fighting Terrorism

After Islamist terrorists murdered Americans and burned a U.S. consulate to the ground in Benghazi, the President claimed he was winning. As homegrown terrorists kill in Boston and London, he claims he is winning. As the Taliban mocks the U.S. standing down in Afghanistan, he claims he is winning.
By James Carafano at Heritage Foundation
“We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender…”
These were words President Obama never used during his speech at the National Defense University yesterday. Rather, he said anything but anything that sounded like Winston Churchill’s immortal speech about defiance in the face of the march of tyranny.
In large part, there was nothing new in the counterterrorism strategy the President announced. Flash back to 2011—that was the real turning point. Before then, Obama really followed what was called “Bush-lite,” pretty much the same tactics as the previous Administration—just dropping all the rhetoric.
The war of ideas was completely banned from the Obama lexicon. Islamist terrorism became “violent extremism.” Terrorism became “senseless violence.” In 2011, however, Obama shifted course dramatically. More than dumping the war of words, the White House signed off on a new counterterrorism strategy that amounted to running away from Iraq and Afghanistan as quickly as possible and limiting the offensive campaign to whacking top-level al-Qaeda with drone strikes.
The new strategy was bound to fail, fighting the last war while al-Qaeda evolved into a global insurgency that has spread from Pakistan to Nigeria.
Yet, even as the new fronts in the war on terrorism sprang up, the Administration continued to argue that it was winning. After Islamist terrorists murdered Americans and burned a U.S. consulate to the ground in Benghazi, the President claimed he was winning. As homegrown terrorists kill in Boston and London, he claims he is winning. As the Taliban mocks the U.S. standing down in Afghanistan, he claims he is winning.
>>> See what the Administration said about the London attack
Rather than admit failure and change course, faced with criticism here at home, the President has decided to declare victory, hoping this will reenergize support from the left. In his speech, he promised to do even less and make the less more transparent. This will no doubt please progressives who were unhappy that Obama carried over any vestige of the Bush policies.
While this speech may make the President more popular with the progressive caucus, it amounts to Maginot Line strategy: The U.S. won’t go after them if they don’t come after us. If they do come after us—we will treat them like any other criminal. If they do get through—it won’t be our fault; it will be the result of addled minds and “senseless” violence. Obama has warped backed to the Clinton counterterrorism strategy of the 1990s without remembering that was the strategy that led to 9/11.
Obama framed the challenges we face today as a false choice between sitting back and global, endless, borderless war. In reality, there is much that the U.S. can to defend itself: dismantle global terrorist networks; push back on political Islam; and champion freedom in the world. There are options between doing nothing and invading countries. President Obama has decided to ignore them. He is sick of fighting. Unfortunately, America’s enemies are not.
Also please consider:
Homeland Security guidelines advise deference to pro-Shariah Muslim supremacists
Obama Protects and Arms Islamic Terrorism
ICYMI: How Dept. of Homeland Security identifies ‘right wing extremists’
Three Benghazigate Women
Bill (Domestic Terrorist) Ayers and His Media Groupies
“What difference does it make?” – That Obama & Hillary Lied, Americans Died?
New Evidence of Obama Coverup on Benghazi Terror Attack
Obama, Kerry Stonewall in Bengahzi Coverup
There Is a Motive for Terror and Islam Is Its Name
Bomber’s Mother Doesn’t Care Sons Sacrificed – When will we understand it’s Islam?
Obama Silent as Arab ‘Spring’ Wars on Christians
Death to Jews! – Obama Arms Muslim Terrorists for 2nd Holocaust
Arab Spring rapidly turning into Christian winter
Obama’s “Arab spring” turns ugly – “One Nation for New Holocaust”
Arab Spring 1 Year Later: Outlook Gloomy for Suffering Christians
The Muslim Brotherhood in America
Andy McCarthy on Muslim Brotherhood Influence Operations in the US
Obama empowering Muslim Brotherhood
Why the West Loves Lying to Itself About Islam
Muslim Brotherhood suckers Hillary – or is she complicit?
Jihad plotting persists in mosques
Jihad explained by a jihadist
Egyptian activist to Obama: Stop Supporting the Muslim Brotherhood
Media Sees No Evil in Muslim Persecutions Against Christians
Obama’s Arab Spring turns radical Islamist
Gaffney: Obama policies leading to new ‘horrific’ war for Israel
Gaffney: Obama sides with radical Muslims in Arab uprisings
Obama encouraging Muslim Brotherhood to be part of post-Mubarak government
Allen West and Frank Gaffney on North Africa jihad
Appeaser in Chief Leading to Catastrophe
Obama’s Wrong Side of History
Flashback Sept. 2011: Gaffney – Obama policies leading to new ‘horrific’ war for Israel
Obama Administration Silent on Muslim Brotherhood Ties
Obama’s World Without America
Terror TV Pays Al Gore $100 Million for U.S. Media Access
Beck Exposé on Muslim Brotherhood Now on DVD
CBS Reporter Says Islamic Terrorists Are Winning
Muslims Offended So Decorated Soldier’s Career Destroyed
Team Obama’s Mendacity
Muslim Influence in Pentagon Prevails
Help Make A Difference By Sharing These Articles On Facebook, Twitter And Elsewhere: