Worried About Privacy? How Common Core Exposes Your Kids

Outside data managers must be employed to maintain this personal data on your kids. Is there any level of oversight to ensure this data is protected?
By Dr. Paul Kengor
There’s an intense debate right now over “Common Core,” an effort to implement a set of education standards in public schools nationwide. The Common Core State Standards thus far have been adopted by 45 states and the District of Columbia.
Though it isn’t my area of expertise, I’ve received numerous impassioned emails on the subject. Among them, one person’s concerns particularly struck me.
This person is an expert in the field of education. She is thoughtful, serious, and no foe of public education. Her concerns especially hit home given current fears over privacy intrusions by the federal government. Those fears have swirled around the National Security Agency, the Justice Department, and the IRS. But they don’t end there. There are likewise potentially serious privacy problems involving current and proposed education policy, which likewise relate to data collection, dissemination, and use.
To that end, my friend is hoping to at least help kindle some public awareness.
“The portion [of current education policy] that I believe is most important for raising public awareness,” she writes, “is the changes to the FERPA regulations which have greatly expanded who has access to student data.” FERPA is the Federal Education Rights and Privacy Act of 1974. Changes have been made to FERPA that (some believe) will leave parents uninformed as to how their children’s records are shared. “Parents seem totally unaware of what data is being collected,” she adds. “In Pennsylvania it is collected under something called the PIMS system, but in other states it has different labels.”
There’s more. There’s also the problem of a rise in “outside vendors and providers to manage student data—again, without parental consent.”
How, specifically, would this happen?
For starters, Common Core standards, as was the case with previous standards, lead to much testing, which involves a great deal of data collection on students. Coupled with this heightened collection of student data is the prevalence of so-called “longitudinal state reporting systems.” According to my friend, as part of the “Race to the Top” initiative, a federal educational initiative, states were encouraged to create “robust data collection systems.” These systems were touted as a mechanism to provide school districts, state governments, and federal policymakers with more data to analyze trends in student achievement and improve educational efforts. While this might seem benign, notes my friend, we cannot ignore the sheer volume of data that will be collected and how that data might be misused. For instance, most parents have no idea that their child’s “personal information” includes not just test scores but social security numbers, attendance records, records of interaction with school counselors, identification of learning disabilities, and even disciplinary records.
All of this is being collected.
And yet, because such enhanced data collection exceeds the resources of many districts and states, schools will be forced to contract the service to corporations that collect, manage, and store such data—and possibly share it. In other words, outside data managers must be employed to maintain this personal data on your kids. Is there any level of oversight to ensure this data is protected?
My friend writes that “this trend of data collection relates to changes in the FERPA regulations by the Education Department in 2011. These changes, made without congressional approval, now allow third party access to student data without the consent of parents. For example, vendors, seeking to market particular products, can access this data.”
And there’s still more, relating specifically to private religious schools. My friend adds: “One particular concern that I think speaks to Catholic interests is the rush on the part of some dioceses (and other private schools) to adopt the Common Core and buy-in to the assessments connected with such systems (and as such the data collection).”
Indeed, the Catholic press is hot on this issue, realizing the distinct impact that Common Core can have on Catholic schools—the nation’s largest segment of private/religious schooling. Nationwide, groups of Catholics have sprung up in protest. The National Catholic Education Association hasn’t endorsed the standards, but is helping Catholic schools prepare for implementation.
Perhaps most troublesome, all of this derives from federal/national influences, even as Common Core is instituted at the state level. As my friend states: “the push for the adoption of the state longitudinal data systems and the Common Core assessment collection all stem from national influences. Certainly, the changes in FERPA were undertaken through the U.S. Department of Education.”
My friend sums up: “I find the level of data collection on individual students to be excessive, and the transparency … to be lacking.” Such data collection methods “put the federal government in a position to track student achievement in ways that have been previously unavailable due to the sheer size of data mining, and have been (until recently) safeguarded by privacy regulations. As an educator I care deeply about the ability for our nation’s school children to achieve high levels of learning, yet I believe the decisions for student learning are best accomplished at the classroom and school level, not the federal level.”
We’re facing, in essence, unchecked data collection as part of a significant and sweeping federal educational mandate. Are we ready for this, and all its repercussions?
My friend pleads for some “public awareness and dialogue in this area.” Who could object to that?
Also please consider:
Common Core and CSCOPE – Propaganda in Education
Common Core and Universal Design for Learning
Anti-religious group wants climate indoctrination in schools
Educator Warns of Public School Socialist Agenda in Recently Released Book
Rising Black Social Pathology
Teachers union promotes Alinsky radicals guide to revolution
UAW, NEA roots in establishing Marxism in America
NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION (NEA)
The best government money can buy -top 20 public sector union paid politicians
Education Costs Higher Than Reported
Hijacked Schools – Parents Keep Out
Abolish Public Schools
Slouching From Gomorrah: Remembering Robert Bork
School Shooting Caused by Sinful Soul, Souless Education
Obama’s Education ‘Progress’ Is Only Union Hiring Not Improving Education
Public School Spending. There’s a Chart for That!
Chicago teachers personification of greedy, lazy, utterly unreasonable teacher’s unions
Useless, Costly Teacher’s Unions
Chicago Teachers Union Makes War On Kids And Parents
The Machine: The Truth Behind Teachers Unions
Educational Lunacy
Education Sec. says OK to get students into protesting
Education is the Foundation of the Socialist Future
Theater Shooter a Product of “Liberal” Education
Cultural Equivalency
WTH? Highest spending creates worst schools?
PBS: Re-Educating America’s Schoolchildren, Thanks to Your Contributions
Prostitution, Education and The Future
Nationalizing Education Indoctrination
The Big Race Hoax
A Failing Grade for America’s Educational System
Obama’s Education Takeover
Bobby Jindal Takes Up Education Reform and Takes On Teachers Unions
Common Core and Universal Design for Learning
Rising Black Social Pathology
Educator Warns of Public School Socialist Agenda in Recently Released Book
Progressivism Masquerading as Education
Learning the Truth About Education
Teachers union promotes Alinsky radicals guide to revolution
The Department of Education – Who Needs it?
They met to kill God and establish Marxism
The Failing Promise of Public Education
Teachers union says parents too stupid to understand ratings
We Don’t Need No (Leftist) Education
Pushing Junk Science on Children
The Urban Plantation
Department of Education’s slush funds
Stupid in America: How We Cheat Our Kids
Losing the Brains Race
Union Teachers Explain How to Push Marxism in the Classroom
The Toxic Influence of Progressive Education Schools on K-12 Curricula
Colleges push “social justice” propaganda on students and future teachers
NEA Lesson Plan: Teach Kids To A) Vote for Democrats; B) Masturbate
Education Dept. Blocks Reporters from LGBT ‘Youth Summit’ Sessions for Teens
Pro-life group plans flash mob protest of NEA abortion agenda
Stealth Islamic Propaganda Shown to Six Million American Students
UAW, NEA roots in establishing Marxism in America
Union Teachers Explain How to Push Marxism in the Classroom
Losing the Brains Race
For the Nation’s Sake, Cut Education Spending
Don’t Hold Children Captive to Failing Public Schools
A ‘liberal’ education? 2nd graders perform sex acts in class with teacher present
Preparing Our Children for Global Citizenship
Education Department teams with unions in global effort at ‘progressive’ reform
Enforcing the propaganda of climate dogma
Inconvenient nonsense infiltrates the classroom
We Don’t Need No (Leftist) Education
The Department of Education – Who Needs it?
The Anti-Parent Agenda of Colleges
Stupid in America: How We Cheat Our Kids
Pushing Junk Science on Children
Education secretary vows climate indoctrination
The Department of Education – Who Needs it?
Pimping for the left – Education secretary urged his employees to attend Sharpton’s rally
Stealth Islamic Propaganda Shown to Six Million American Students
Anti-bully campaign bullies Christians – pushes gay agenda
Help Make A Difference By Sharing These Articles On Facebook, Twitter And Elsewhere: